Bitcoin is controlled by an increasingly smaller number of entities

Bitcoin is experiencing a significant shift in the distribution of its ownership. According to research data from financial magazine Finbold based on data from Glassnode and Gemini, only 216 entities today own more than 30% of all circulating BTC. This trend is a direct result of the sharp increase in institutional interest and centralized cryptocurrency custody methods.

Only 216 Entities Hold One-Third of All BTC

216
Entities Control
30% of All Bitcoin

Ten years ago, centralized exchanges held only about 600,000 BTC. In 2025, however, this number jumped to over 6 million BTC, representing an increase of 924%. This development shows that while Bitcoin price rose from less than $1,000 to today’s over $107,000, its holdings have concentrated into the hands of a relatively small number of players.

2015 Holdings
600K BTC
Centralized Exchanges
2025 Holdings
6M BTC
+924% Increase

Six Main Categories of Bitcoin Holders

Centralized Exchanges
ETF Funds
Public Companies
Private Companies
DeFi Contracts
Governments

Of the 216 entities, a large portion falls into six categories: centralized exchanges, ETF funds, public and private companies, DeFi contracts, and governments. Exchanges still play a dominant role, but clear growth is also visible among funds and government institutions.

Share of Institution Types Holding Bitcoin
According to Bitinfocharts data, only 4 wallets hold more than 100,000 BTC. In the range of 10,000 to 100,000 BTC, there are only 90 wallets, and from 1,000 to 10,000 BTC, only 2,000 wallets. These groups together control up to 37.14% of all coins in circulation, and this doesn’t even count permanently lost coins, so their actual share is much higher.
Bitcoin Distribution by Wallet Size
100K+ BTC
4
Wallets
10K-100K BTC
90
Wallets
1K-10K BTC
2,000
Wallets
Total Control
37.14%
of Supply

Bitcoin and Systemic Risks

Benefits
  • ✓ Increased legitimacy
  • ✓ Enhanced liquidity
  • ✓ Easier institutional access
  • ✓ ETF product availability
  • ✓ Strategic treasury asset
Risks
  • ⚠ Systemic risk concentration
  • ⚠ Regulatory vulnerability
  • ⚠ Security incident impact
  • ⚠ Market manipulation potential
  • ⚠ Centralization concerns

This trend has both advantages and disadvantages. On one hand, the growing participation of regulated players adds legitimacy and liquidity to Bitcoin. Institutional investors, supported by the emergence of ETF products, can easily invest without needing to secure private keys themselves. Similarly, companies like MicroStrategy and Tesla view Bitcoin as a long-term strategic tool against fiat currency devaluation.

On the other hand, the concentration of BTC in the hands of a few entities represents significant systemic risk. If regulatory intervention or a security incident occurred at any of these entities, it could have a serious impact on the entire market.

Governments, which once ignored BTC, today acknowledge ownership, often as confiscated assets. Although their holdings are still relatively small, the trend is clear – states are entering the crypto space.

Bitcoin Decided by Just a Handful of People
While institutions continue to accumulate Bitcoin, the original vision of decentralized ownership is slowly fading. Although Bitcoin’s acceptance as a legitimate asset is increasing, the risk is also growing that its future will be decided only by the biggest players.
The Decentralization Paradox: As Bitcoin gains mainstream acceptance and institutional adoption, its founding principle of decentralized ownership faces unprecedented challenges. The concentration of holdings among a small number of entities could fundamentally alter Bitcoin’s nature and decision-making processes.
xlubecx

Written by

xlubecx